Ip Valuation Services
Ip Valuation Services requires precise documentation and timely submission. I-Pro Solutions manages the complete workflow including trademark valuation and.
Dedicated specialist
CA-led, named point of contact
Tracked client portal
Real-time status, end-to-end
Money-back accuracy
Refile-free if our error
Flat-fee pricing
No hidden charges, ever
About this service
Ip Valuation Services is a key regulatory filing administered by No specific regulator โ the IP valuation is a commercial advisory practice regulated by: (i) the **ICAI** (for ICAI members in practice โ under the ICAI Valuation Standards 2018 [ICVS 1โ4] and the ICAI Code of Ethics for Valuers); (ii) the **IBBI** (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India โ for Registered Valuers under the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules 2017 โ for valuations under the Companies Act 2013, the IBC 2016, and the SARFAESI Act 2002); (iii) the **SEBI** (for IP valuations in the context of IPOs, takeovers, preferential allotments โ under the SEBI ICDR Regulations 2018, SEBI SAST Regulations 2011, SEBI LODR Regulations 2015); (iv) the **RBI** (for cross-border IP transfers โ under the FEMA 1999 and the RBI Master Direction on External Commercial Borrowings, Trade Credits, and Structured Obligations); (v) the **CBDT** (Central Board of Direct Taxes โ for IP valuations in the context of transfer pricing under s.92C of the Income-tax Act 1961 and the Arm's Length Price determination โ for cross-border IP transactions between associated enterprises); (vi) the **CCI** (Competition Commission of India โ for IP valuations in the context of combinations / mergers under the Competition Act 2002 s.20).. Filing is executed via No statutory forms โ the IP valuation report is produced in the format prescribed by the engagement letter and the relevant standards (ICVS 2018, IVS 2022, ISO 10668:2010). Standard valuation reports typically include: (i) **Executive Summary** โ the valuation conclusion (the fair value of the IP), the valuation date, the purpose of the valuation, and the limitations; (ii) **Engagement Letter** โ the scope of the engagement, the deliverables, the timeline, the fees, and the limitations; (iii) **Description of the IP** โ the type of IP (patent / trade mark / copyright / design / GI / trade secret / know-how / software / brand), the registration status, the legal ownership, the encumbrances (licences, security interests); (iv) **Valuation Approaches Considered** โ the three approaches (cost, market, income) โ and the approach selected (with justification); (v) **Valuation Methodology** โ the detailed methodology (DCF, royalty relief, MPEE, with-and-without โ for the income approach; comparable transactions, multiples โ for the market approach; historical cost, replacement cost, reproduction cost โ for the cost approach); (vi) **Assumptions and Limitations** โ the key assumptions (revenue projections, royalty rates, discount rates, useful life of the IP, terminal value); (vii) **Valuation Conclusion** โ the fair value of the IP (typically a range, with a point estimate); (viii) **Reconciliation of Values** โ where multiple approaches are used, a reconciliation of the values from each approach; (ix) **Sensitivity Analysis** โ the impact of changes in key assumptions (revenue growth, royalty rate, discount rate) on the valuation conclusion; (x) **Valuer's Certificate** โ signed by the valuer (an ICAI Chartered Accountant or an IBBI Registered Valuer), with the valuer's registration number and date. under This is a **commercial practice** โ no statutory filing or government form is required. The engagement is governed by (i) the **Indian Contract Act 1872** โ the engagement letter between the client and I-Pro constitutes a contract for services; (ii) the **Indian Evidence Act 1872 s.65B** โ for the admissibility of the valuation report as an electronic record in any litigation; (iii) the **ICAI Accounting Standard 26 (Intangible Assets)** โ issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) in 2002, in force 1 April 2003 โ for non-Ind-AS companies; key paragraphs: para 18 (recognition โ probable future economic benefits and reliable measurement of cost), para 25โ32 (measurement at recognition โ at cost), para 44โ53 (amortisation โ finite useful life, amortised on a systematic basis; indefinite useful life, not amortised but tested for impairment annually), para 56โ65 (impairment โ reference to AS 28 Impairment of Assets), para 82โ87 (disclosures); (iv) **Ind AS 38 (Intangible Assets)** โ substituted for AS 26 for Ind-AS-compliant companies (listed and unlisted companies with net worth โฅ โน250 crore or annual turnover โฅ โน250 crore or borrowings โฅ โน50 crore โ under the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules 2015, as amended) โ in force from financial year 2017โ18; (v) **AS 28 (Impairment of Assets)** โ for impairment testing of intangible assets (including IP) โ when the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount (the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use), an impairment loss is recognised; (vi) **AS 26 / Ind AS 38 vs IFRS for SMEs Section 18** โ for SMEs applying IFRS for SMEs (the IFRS for SMEs Section 18 is a simplified version of IAS 38 โ applies to SMEs in jurisdictions that have adopted IFRS for SMEs; India has not adopted IFRS for SMEs โ Indian SMEs follow AS 26 or Ind AS 38 โ **NOT CONFIRMED โ PROFESSIONAL VERIFICATION REQUIRED** for whether Indian SMEs may apply IFRS for SMEs); (vii) **IAS 38 (Intangible Assets)** โ international standard (the global counterpart of Ind AS 38); (viii) **ISO 10668:2010 (Brand Valuation โ Requirements for Monetary Brand Valuation)** โ international standard for brand valuation; three-stage approach (scope of work, valuation, reporting basis) โ three approaches (cost, market, income); (ix) **International Valuation Standards (IVS) 2022** โ issued by the International Valuation Standards Council (IVSC); effective 31 January 2022 โ General Standards (IVS 101 Scope of Work, IVS 102 Investigations and Compliance, IVS 103 Reporting) and Asset Standards (IVS 200 Business and Business Interests, IVS 210 Intangible Assets โ defines the cost, market, income approaches and the royalty relief, multi-period excess earnings methods); (x) **ICAI Valuation Standards (ICVS) 2018** โ issued by the ICAI on 7 February 2018, in force 1 April 2019 for valuation reports issued by ICAI members in practice โ ICVS 1 (Introduction), ICVS 2 (Valuation Bases and Approaches), ICVS 3 (Valuation Approaches and Methods), ICVS 4 (Valuation of Intangible Assets); (xi) **Companies Act 2013** โ s.246 (Valuation by Registered Valuer โ for the purpose of the Companies Act, including IP valuation for mergers, amalgamations, restructuring, buyback, issue of shares on a preferential basis) โ the valuer must be registered with the IBBI (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India) under the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules 2017; (xii) **Income-tax Act 1961** โ s.56(2)(viib) (angel tax โ issue of shares at a premium above the fair market value determined under Rule 11UA of the Income Tax Rules 1962 โ the connection to IP valuation is that the brand / IP value underpins the share premium justification; the user brief's reference to "s.56(vi)(b)" appears to be a typo for s.56(2)(viib) โ flagged as **NOT CONFIRMED โ PROFESSIONAL VERIFICATION REQUIRED**); s.9(1)(vi) (royalty income deemed to accrue or arise in India); s.194J (TDS on royalty โ 10% for residents, 20% for non-residents; reduced to 5% for use of patent for residents); s.35(2)(ii)/(iia)/(iv) (weighted deduction for R&D โ 200% for in-house R&D reduced to 100% from FY 2020โ21; 100% for R&D to approved institutions); s.80-OO / s.80-O (abolished โ historically allowed deduction for royalty income); s.44BB / s.44BBB (for non-resident royalties); (xiii) **FEMA 1999** โ for cross-border IP transfers (FC-GPR for IP brought in as foreign investment; FC-TRS for transfer of IP between residents and non-residents; Form 10FC for any other cross-border IP transaction); (xiv) **SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations 2018** โ Reg 26(1) for IP risk disclosure in IPO filings; Reg 32 for the valuation report in preferential allotments; (xv) **SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations 2011** โ for IP-related disclosures in open offers; (xvi) **SARFAESI Act 2002** โ s.31(1)(t) excludes intangibles from "security interest" โ but in practice Indian banks lend against IP on a security interest basis โ **NOT CONFIRMED โ PROFESSIONAL VERIFICATION REQUIRED** for the current practice of IP-backed lending in India; (xvii) **Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016** โ for the valuation of IP assets in the insolvency resolution process under s.18 (powers and functions of the interim resolution professional) read with the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations 2016 Reg 27โ34.. Our specialist-led team ensures full compliance with statutory documentation, eligibility verification, and expedited government approval.
Eligibility & thresholds
- Valid identity & address proof of applicant
- Active PAN & registered business premises
- Authorized representative authorization
- Compliant under applicable regulatory laws
- No pending statutory disqualifications
- Valid across authorized operational jurisdictions
- Pre-filing statutory documentation verification
- Official statutory fee schedule as per authority
- Mandatory periodic compliance filings post-approval
What's included
Everything in one transparent fee โ no add-ons, no surprises.
Government charges only โ separate from I-Pro's professional fee. All figures verified as of 25 August 2026.
| Fee Component | Amount (โน) | Basis / Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Ip Valuation Services Statutory Filing | โน0 (No government fee) | Government fee is Nil / exempted under applicable statutory rulesOfficial Regulator |
| Total Government Fee | No fee | (for default assumptions stated below) |
Government charges only โ separate from I-Pro's professional fee. Verified 25 August 2026.
Required documents
Each list identifies exactly what to provide โ and what you do not need to submit. Use the accordions to expand.
- โบFor the IP valuation engagement: โ For the IP valuation engagement:
- โบthe **engagement letter** signed by the client and the valuer, specifying the scope, the deliverable โ the **engagement letter** signed by the client and the valuer, specifying the scope, the deliverables, the timeline, the fees, and the limitations; (ii) the **client's IP register** (where maintained โ see IP Audit, Service 6 above); (iii) the **IP registration certificates** (for registered IP โ patents, trade marks, designs, GIs, copyrights); (iv) the **IP assignment / licence agreements** (for the chain of title and the encumbrances);
- โบthe **financial statements of the client** for the last 5 years (audited balance sheet, profit and l โ the **financial statements of the client** for the last 5 years (audited balance sheet, profit and loss statement, cash flow statement โ for the DCF analysis); (vi) the **revenue projections for the IP** for the next 5โ10 years (typically prepared by the client's management, with the assumptions disclosed โ for the DCF and royalty relief analysis); (vii) the **royalty rate benchmarks** from RoyaltyRange / ktMINE / BVR (for the royalty relief analysis); (viii) the **comparable transactions** (recent M&A transactions involving similar IP โ for the market approach); (ix) the **cost records** (for the cost approach โ the historical R&D cost, the patent prosecution cost, the trade mark prosecution cost);
- โบthe **valuer's professional indemnity insurance** (typically โน50,00,000 to โน5,00,00,000 โ **NOT CONF โ the **valuer's professional indemnity insurance** (typically โน50,00,000 to โน5,00,00,000 โ **NOT CONFIRMED โ PROFESSIONAL VERIFICATION REQUIRED** for the typical insurance coverage for IP valuers in India).
How it works
Each step is labelled with who performs it โ Customer, I-Pro, or the Regulator. Form names are linked to the official portal.
- 1Customerโฑ 1 - 3 Days
Step 1: **Customer** briefs I-Pro on the valuation engagement
**Customer** briefs I-Pro on the valuation engagement โ the IP to be valued, the purpose of the valuation (M&A, IPO, fund-raising, insolvency, lending, transfer pricing, tax, licensing), the valuation date, the timeline, the budget, and the engagement letter terms. - 2I-Proโฑ 1 - 3 Days
Step 2: **I-Pro** drafts the **engagement letter** specifying the scope, the delivera...
**I-Pro** drafts the **engagement letter** specifying the scope, the deliverables, the valuation approaches to be used (cost, market, income โ typically all three are considered, with the most appropriate approach selected based on the IP type and the available data), the assumptions and limitations, the timeline, the fees, and the limitations of the engagement (the valuation is the valuer's opinion based on the information available โ it is not a guarantee of the actual value). - 3I-Proโฑ 1 - 3 Days
Step 3: **I-Pro** conducts the **IP identification**
**I-Pro** conducts the **IP identification** โ confirms the IP exists, identifies the legal ownership (the registered proprietor / patentee / author / assignee / licensee), and identifies the encumbrances (licences, security interests, litigation). For patents, I-Pro verifies the patent's status on InPASS (whether "GRANTED" or "REVOKED" or "LAPSED"); for trade marks, on the Trade Marks Public Search; for designs, on the Designs Public Search; for GIs, on the GI Public Search; for copyrights, on the Copyright Search. - 4I-Proโฑ 1 - 3 Days
Step 4: **I-Pro** conducts the **valuation approach selection**
**I-Pro** conducts the **valuation approach selection** โ for patents, the income approach (DCF, royalty relief) is typically the most appropriate (the cost approach is rarely used because the historical R&D cost is not indicative of the future economic benefits; the market approach is rarely used because of the absence of comparable transactions for unique patents โ though ktMINE / BVR may provide some comparables); for trade marks / brands, the income approach (royalty relief, with-and-without) is typically the most appropriate, supplemented by the market approach (Brand Finance / Interbrand rankings); for copyrights (especially software), the cost approach (replacement cost) is typically used, supplemented by the income approach; for designs, the income approach (royalty relief โ the design's contribution to the article's revenue); for GIs, the income approach (the premium of the GI over non-GI comparables); for trade secrets / know-how, the income approach (the cost savings from having the trade secret, or the additional revenue from the trade secret). - 5I-Proโฑ 1 - 3 Days
Step 5: **I-Pro** conducts the **valuation analysis**
**I-Pro** conducts the **valuation analysis** โ for the income approach, prepares the DCF model with the revenue projections, the royalty rate (typically 2โ10% for patents, 1โ5% for trade marks, 5โ15% for software, 1โ10% for designs โ **NOT CONFIRMED โ PROFESSIONAL VERIFICATION REQUIRED** for the typical royalty rates for each IP type), the discount rate (the weighted average cost of capital [WACC] of the client, typically 12โ18% for Indian companies โ **NOT CONFIRMED โ PROFESSIONAL VERIFICATION REQUIRED**), the useful life of the IP (for patents, the remaining patent term โ typically 10โ15 years; for trade marks, indefinite โ but typically valued over 10โ20 years given the commercial uncertainty; for copyrights, the remaining copyright term โ typically life of author + 60 years; for designs, the remaining design term โ typically 5โ15 years; for GIs, indefinite โ but typically valued over 20โ30 years), and the terminal value (typically the Gordon growth model with a 2โ4% perpetual growth rate โ **NOT CONFIRMED โ PROFESSIONAL VERIFICATION REQUIRED**). - 6I-Proโฑ 1 - 3 Days
Step 6: **I-Pro** conducts the **market approach analysis**
**I-Pro** conducts the **market approach analysis** โ identifies comparable transactions (recent M&A transactions involving similar IP), computes the multiples (revenue multiple, EBITDA multiple, royalty rate multiple), and applies the multiples to the IP being valued. - 7I-Proโฑ 1 - 3 Days
Step 7: **I-Pro** conducts the **cost approach analysis**
**I-Pro** conducts the **cost approach analysis** โ computes the historical cost (the original R&D cost, the patent prosecution cost), the replacement cost (the cost to recreate the IP today), and the reproduction cost (the cost to reproduce the IP exactly as it exists today); applies an obsolescence discount (typically 20โ50% for IP that is no longer state-of-the-art โ **NOT CONFIRMED โ PROFESSIONAL VERIFICATION REQUIRED**). - 8I-Proโฑ 1 - 3 Days
Step 8: **I-Pro** conducts the **reconciliation of values**
**I-Pro** conducts the **reconciliation of values** โ where multiple approaches are used, the valuer reconciles the values from each approach (typically weighted: 70% income, 20% market, 10% cost โ or some other weighting based on the relevance of each approach to the IP being valued โ **NOT CONFIRMED โ PROFESSIONAL VERIFICATION REQUIRED** for the typical weighting). - 9I-Proโฑ 1 - 3 Days
Step 9: **I-Pro** drafts the **valuation report**
**I-Pro** drafts the **valuation report** โ typically 30โ100 pages โ with the executive summary, the engagement letter, the description of the IP, the valuation approaches considered, the valuation methodology, the assumptions and limitations, the valuation conclusion, the reconciliation of values, the sensitivity analysis, and the valuer's certificate. - 10Regulatorโฑ 1 - 3 Days
Step 10: **I-Pro** delivers the report to the client and **presents the valuation conc...
**I-Pro** delivers the report to the client and **presents the valuation conclusion** โ typically in a 1โ2 hour meeting with the client's senior management; the client may request clarifications or additional analysis (e.g., a sensitivity analysis on a different discount rate, a deeper analysis of the comparable transactions).
Post-registration compliance
What to file next. I-Pro handles these as part of the annual compliance package.
| Filing | Form | Deadline |
|---|---|---|
| Statutory IP Renewal (Form TM-R / Patent Form 12) Penalty: Surcharge fee; removal of mark from official Register | 10 Years | Every 10 years prior to certificate expiration date |
| Response to Examination Report / Objection Penalty: Application deemed abandoned without oral hearing | Event-based | Formal legal reply within 30 days of examiner report issuance |
| Continuous Commercial Use & Evidence Maintenance Penalty: Vulnerability to cancellation / rectification for non-use (Section 47) | Continuous | Retain continuous invoices, packaging, and digital promotional records |
| Proper Statutory Registered Symbol Usage Penalty: Imprisonment up to 3 years and criminal prosecution under Section 107 | Continuous | Use (R) symbol strictly after registration grant certificate issue |
Penalties for non-compliance
Statutory penalties under governing regulatory provisions. Avoid non-compliance delays.
| Non-compliance | Provision | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Statutory IP Renewal (Form TM-R / Patent Form 12) | 10 Years | Surcharge fee; removal of mark from official Register |
| Response to Examination Report / Objection | Event-based | Application deemed abandoned without oral hearing |
| Continuous Commercial Use & Evidence Maintenance | Continuous | Vulnerability to cancellation / rectification for non-use (Section 47) |
| Proper Statutory Registered Symbol Usage | Continuous | Imprisonment up to 3 years and criminal prosecution under Section 107 |
Common mistakes to avoid
Avoidable filing errors that cause delays or rejection. Each can be resolved before submission.
- 1Mismatched applicant legal name or identity details across KYC proofsWhy: Government verification APIs cross-check with UIDAI and MCA databases and automatically flag discrepancies in spelling or dates.Fix: Our specialists pre-validate your documents against official government databases before portal filing.
- 2Submitting outdated utility bills or non-notarized commercial leasesWhy: Premises proofs older than 60 days or defective landlord NOCs trigger statutory scrutiny queries and multi-week processing delays.Fix: We verify recent billing dates and provide pre-formatted, legally vetted landlord NOC and lease formats.
- 3Selecting incorrect classification, turnover slab, or statutory activity codeWhy: Applications filed under inappropriate classifications attract show-cause notices and potential rejection without statutory fee refund.Fix: We conduct a statutory scope assessment to align your application with the exact regulatory requirements.
Frequently asked questions
Everything you need to know about this service.
Client feedback
What clients say
Real reviews from founders, finance leads and operators who used our Ip Valuation Services service.
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your experience with Ip Valuation Services.
Recommended Bundles
Instead of buying these services separately, get them together as a package.
IP Enforcement Premium Pack
GI enforcement + IP dispute + TM opposition + Patent opposition + Valuation โ premium enforcement suite.
What's included
IP Audit Growth Pack
Risk audit + Valuation + TM + Patent due diligence โ full IP portfolio review.
What's included
GI Protection Starter Pack
GI registration + Enforcement + Trademark for the regional brand.
What's included